PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETE vs. EETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BETE vs. EETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -41.67% return, which is significantly higher than EETH's -48.73% return.


BETE

1D
-1.16%
1M
-23.42%
YTD
-41.67%
6M
-41.18%
1Y
-41.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EETH

1D
-1.91%
1M
-25.22%
YTD
-48.73%
6M
-48.12%
1Y
-39.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. EETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
-41.67%-8.17%66.02%36.61%
EETH
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF
-48.73%-17.19%33.29%31.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and EETH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.96

The correlation between BETE and EETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETE vs. EETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE
BETE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EETH
EETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. EETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BETEEETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.94

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.57

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.94

-0.19

BETE vs. EETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the EETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and EETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BETE vs. EETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, smaller than the maximum EETH drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and EETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETEEETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.75%

-69.22%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.75%

-69.22%

+7.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.75%

-69.22%

+7.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-30.29%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.38%

41.92%

-5.54%

Volatility

BETE vs. EETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) is 16.09%, while ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that BETE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETEEETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.09%

19.61%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.25%

46.52%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.79%

69.28%

-13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.57%

69.05%

-12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.57%

69.05%

-12.48%

BETE vs. EETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BETE and EETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BETE vs. EETH - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.76%, less than EETH's 103.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
94.76%68.22%15.22%0.78%
EETH
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF
103.62%56.98%10.82%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BETE and EETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EETH has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to BETE (16.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs EETH's -69.22%.

On 1-year performance, EETH leads with -39.38% vs -41.25% for BETE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 16.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EETH has performed better with a -39.38% return vs -41.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BETE and EETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EETH has the higher dividend yield at 103.62%, compared with 94.76% for BETE.

EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETE and EETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer