BETE vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by ProShares, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past year, BETE returned -35.67% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

BETE vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -34.13% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

BETE

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -21.37%
• YTD: -34.13%
• 6M: -38.03%
• 1Y: -35.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-34.13%	-8.17%	16.56%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.06

The correlation between BETE and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BETE vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BETE	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	11.91	-12.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.74	31.26	-31.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	7.44	-6.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	65.71	-66.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	432.16	-433.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BETE vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BETE	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65	11.91	-12.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	10.75	-10.51

Drawdowns

BETE vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.81%	-0.08%	-56.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.81%	-0.06%	-56.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.81%	0.00%	-56.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.36%	-0.00%	-21.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.46%	0.01%	+33.45%

Volatility

BETE vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	0.07%	+9.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.03%	0.24%	+39.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.95%	0.33%	+54.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.48%	0.40%	+56.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.48%	0.40%	+56.08%

BETE vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETE vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.91%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	83.91%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and CSHP in my portfolio?

BETE and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETE or CSHP?

BETE has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -56.81% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -35.67% for BETE. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -35.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or CSHP?

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 83.91%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between BETE and CSHP?

BETE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.