BETE vs. BFOC
BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
BETE vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.46% return.
BETE
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- 6M
- -28.81%
- YTD
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -46.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.68%
BFOC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.88K | $90.06K | $96.80K | |
| $37.88K | $50.79K | $63.29K |
BETE vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -34.37% | -26.91% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.46% | -9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETE and BFOC is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETE vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
BETE
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BETE vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETE vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.75% | -18.41% | -43.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.97% | -18.26% | -38.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -13.50% | -9.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.62% | — | — |
Volatility
BETE vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.28% | 11.68% | +43.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.01% | 11.68% | +44.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.01% | 11.68% | +44.33% |
BETE vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETE vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.50%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 64.54% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETE and BFOC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 64.54%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BETE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for BETE and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer