PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BERCX vs. UMBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERCX achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than UMBMX's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BERCX has underperformed UMBMX with an annualized return of 9.20%, while UMBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


BERCX

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.61%
YTD
9.90%
6M
8.72%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
9.20%

UMBMX

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.55%
YTD
13.58%
6M
11.84%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BERCX
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund
9.90%11.77%11.35%6.93%-11.61%27.30%-3.83%23.31%-10.92%16.98%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
13.58%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BERCX and UMBMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.87

The correlation between BERCX and UMBMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BERCX vs. UMBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERCX
BERCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BERCXUMBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.75

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

10.77

-4.79

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the UMBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERCX and UMBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERCX drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, which is greater than UMBMX's maximum drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERCX and UMBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BERCXUMBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.71%

-49.91%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-9.19%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.57%

-19.41%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-26.30%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-36.91%

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.46%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-7.09%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.35%

+1.04%

Volatility

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) is 4.79%, while Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that BERCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BERCXUMBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

5.34%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

11.99%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

15.00%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

17.80%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

19.12%

+0.08%

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BERCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBMX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BERCX vs. UMBMX - Dividend Comparison

BERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than UMBMX's 9.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BERCX
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund
11.57%12.71%13.39%3.20%1.12%0.60%1.12%2.08%8.03%23.00%3.32%0.92%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
9.06%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


BERCX and UMBMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMBMX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to BERCX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERCX dropped -52.71% vs UMBMX's -49.91%.

UMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BERCX and UMBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer