BEPC vs. XEL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BEPC (Brookfield Renewable Corporation) and XEL (Xcel Energy Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Utilities sector — BEPC in Utilities - Renewable, XEL in Utilities - Regulated Electric. Over the past year, BEPC returned 17.48% vs 19.86% for XEL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BEPC vs. XEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEPC achieves a -3.02% return, which is significantly lower than XEL's 8.05% return.

BEPC

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: -3.02%
• 6M: -4.04%
• 1Y: 17.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XEL

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.01%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 11.62%
• 5Y*: 5.95%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEPC vs. XEL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	-3.02%	45.18%	-2.74%
XEL Xcel Energy Inc.	8.05%	13.89%	-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BEPC and XEL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024	0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap BEPC : $6.66B XEL : $49.59B
EPS BEPC : -$29.65 XEL : $3.50
PS Ratio BEPC : 1.63 XEL : 3.20
Total Revenue (TTM) BEPC : $4.03B XEL : $14.78B
Gross Profit (TTM) BEPC : $1.93B XEL : $1.88B
EBITDA (TTM) BEPC : $563.03M XEL : $6.26B

Return for Risk

BEPC vs. XEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEPC

BEPC Risk / Return Rank: 59
BEPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BEPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BEPC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BEPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BEPC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

XEL

XEL Risk / Return Rank: 70
XEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
XEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XEL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
XEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
XEL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEPC vs. XEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEPC	XEL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	0.96	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.53	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.19	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	1.60	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.16	4.14	-1.98

BEPC vs. XEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the XEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEPC and XEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEPC vs. XEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEPC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum XEL drawdown of -80.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPC and XEL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEPC	XEL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-80.64%	+60.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.92%	-11.50%	-8.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.16%	-4.89%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.36%	-11.32%	+4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.48%	4.45%	+4.03%

Volatility

BEPC vs. XEL - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) at 6.90%. This indicates that BEPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEPC	XEL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.63%	6.90%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.73%	14.38%	+12.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.73%	19.13%	+14.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.32%	20.80%	+14.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.32%	21.69%	+13.63%

Dividends

BEPC vs. XEL - Dividend Comparison

BEPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than XEL's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	4.19%	3.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEL Xcel Energy Inc.	2.19%	3.83%	2.43%	3.36%	2.78%	2.70%	2.58%	2.55%	3.09%	2.99%	3.34%	3.56%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEPC and XEL in my portfolio?

BEPC and XEL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEPC or XEL?

BEPC has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to XEL (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEPC dropped -19.92% vs XEL's -80.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.