BEP vs. BSTZ
BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.) and BSTZ (BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II) are both stocks. BEP operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while BSTZ operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, BEP returned 3.49%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for BSTZ. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BEP vs. BSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEP achieves a 38.60% return, which is significantly higher than BSTZ's 35.52% return.
BEP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 8.52%
- YTD
- 38.60%
- 6M
- 32.04%
- 1Y
- 60.41%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.61%
BSTZ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 35.52%
- 6M
- 37.09%
- 1Y
- 68.99%
- 3Y*
- 32.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- —
BEP vs. BSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 38.60% | 25.65% | -8.23% | 9.02% | -26.48% | -13.69% | 80.30% | 38.83% |
BSTZ BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II | 35.52% | 25.06% | 37.49% | 18.72% | -55.34% | 12.71% | 87.46% | 4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEP and BSTZ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
BEP:
$11.08B
BSTZ:
$2.04B
BEP:
$0.66
BSTZ:
$8.53
BEP:
55.27
BSTZ:
3.47
BEP:
0.40
BSTZ:
0.38
BEP:
1.67
BSTZ:
5.63
BEP:
2.99
BSTZ:
1.19
BEP:
$6.37B
BSTZ:
$361.49M
BEP:
$2.19B
BSTZ:
$169.67M
BEP:
$4.69B
BSTZ:
$586.67M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEP vs. BSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
BEP
BSTZ
BEP vs. BSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II (BSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEP | BSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.49 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 7.49 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 23.14 | -13.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEP | BSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.96 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.20 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.51 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
BEP vs. BSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEP drawdown since its inception was -53.85%, smaller than the maximum BSTZ drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP and BSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEP | BSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -60.51% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -9.26% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.58% | -25.31% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.46% | -60.51% | +13.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -6.18% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -27.52% | +13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.21% | 2.99% | +3.22% |
Volatility
BEP vs. BSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) is 6.09%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II (BSTZ) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that BEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEP | BSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 11.24% | -5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 20.16% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.56% | 23.51% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 27.63% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.97% | 30.24% | -0.27% |
Dividends
BEP vs. BSTZ - Dividend Comparison
BEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than BSTZ's 8.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 4.19% | 5.53% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 4.42% | 2.68% | 4.42% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 5.99% | 6.34% |
BSTZ BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II | 8.52% | 12.46% | 9.75% | 10.90% | 14.73% | 5.14% | 3.42% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BEP vs. BSTZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BEP and BSTZ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSTZ has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to BEP (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEP dropped -53.85% vs BSTZ's -60.51%.
BSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEP and BSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer