PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEP vs. BST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BEP vs. BST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEP achieves a 30.18% return, which is significantly higher than BST's 21.48% return. Over the past 10 years, BEP has underperformed BST with an annualized return of 14.00%, while BST has yielded a comparatively higher 20.10% annualized return.


BEP

1D
-3.00%
1M
0.91%
YTD
30.18%
6M
25.88%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
14.00%

BST

1D
2.64%
1M
5.40%
YTD
21.48%
6M
27.08%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
20.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEP vs. BST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
30.18%25.65%-8.23%9.02%-26.48%-13.69%80.30%90.75%-20.95%24.51%
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
21.48%23.65%17.96%30.07%-38.28%-0.35%69.27%34.57%8.84%57.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BEP and BST is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2014

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEP:

$10.41B

BST:

$1.66B

EPS

BEP:

$0.66

BST:

$15.06

PE Ratio

BEP:

51.91

BST:

3.17

PEG Ratio

BEP:

0.38

BST:

1.71

PS Ratio

BEP:

1.56

BST:

5.96

PB Ratio

BEP:

2.81

BST:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEP:

$6.37B

BST:

$278.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEP:

$2.19B

BST:

$423.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

BEP:

$4.69B

BST:

$522.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEP vs. BST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEP
BEP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BST
BST Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BST Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BST Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEP vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEPBSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.76

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

8.87

-2.68

BEP vs. BST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the BST Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEP and BST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEP vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEP drawdown since its inception was -53.85%, which is greater than BST's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP and BST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEPBSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.85%

-47.72%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-15.31%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.78%

-23.37%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.46%

-47.72%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.85%

-47.72%

-6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.23%

-4.13%

-5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-12.96%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.24%

4.76%

+1.48%

Volatility

BEP vs. BST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) is 7.52%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that BEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEPBSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

9.75%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.88%

16.86%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.82%

19.44%

+9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.98%

23.81%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.99%

25.83%

+4.16%

Dividends

BEP vs. BST - Dividend Comparison

BEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than BST's 8.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
4.46%5.53%6.23%5.14%5.05%4.42%2.68%4.42%7.57%5.36%5.99%6.34%
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
8.27%10.36%8.21%8.91%10.57%5.38%3.85%10.52%6.41%4.80%6.69%6.93%

Financials

BEP vs. BST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.52B
157.07M
(BEP) Total Revenue
(BST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BEP and BST have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BST has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to BEP (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEP dropped -53.85% vs BST's -47.72%.

BST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEP and BST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer