PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BELFA vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BELFA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BELFA achieves a 62.65% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BELFA has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 33.26%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.


BELFA

1D
-0.74%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
62.65%
6M
73.58%
1Y
275.04%
3Y*
71.38%
5Y*
77.06%
10Y*
33.26%

SMH

1D
-1.63%
1M
20.06%
YTD
74.25%
6M
74.08%
1Y
150.04%
3Y*
63.96%
5Y*
38.76%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BELFA vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BELFA
Bel Fuse Inc.
62.65%68.98%39.80%102.03%117.06%14.81%-16.19%19.66%-36.22%-12.91%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
74.25%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BELFA and SMH is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2000

0.26

Over the past year, BELFA and SMH have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BELFA vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BELFA
BELFA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BELFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BELFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BELFA Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BELFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BELFA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BELFA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BELFASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.69

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.70

10.11

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.40

38.76

+0.63

BELFA vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BELFA Sharpe Ratio is 5.13, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BELFA and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BELFASMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.13

4.94

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.56

1.11

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.15

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.34

-0.21

Drawdowns

BELFA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BELFA drawdown since its inception was -89.86%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELFA and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BELFASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.86%

-84.96%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.82%

-14.93%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.43%

-35.74%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.43%

-45.30%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.04%

-45.30%

-32.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.87%

-1.63%

-7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.49%

-41.08%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

3.89%

+3.13%

Volatility

BELFA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFA) has a higher volatility of 17.54% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.58%. This indicates that BELFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BELFASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.54%

11.58%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.64%

24.35%

+14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.03%

30.57%

+23.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.78%

35.01%

+14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.86%

32.57%

+28.29%

Dividends

BELFA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

BELFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BELFA
Bel Fuse Inc.
0.10%0.16%0.27%0.39%0.78%1.60%1.81%1.48%1.75%1.10%0.95%1.64%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


BELFA and SMH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BELFA has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to SMH (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELFA dropped -89.86% vs SMH's -84.96%.

BELFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.13 vs 4.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BELFA and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer