PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEGRX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEGRX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BEGRX has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.


BEGRX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
0.05%
6M
1.98%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
8.64%

UCEQX

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.24%
YTD
13.72%
6M
14.35%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEGRX
Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund
0.05%25.64%8.64%15.40%-11.70%16.64%4.07%22.57%-8.84%12.30%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
13.72%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BEGRX and UCEQX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.87

The correlation between BEGRX and UCEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEGRX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEGRX
BEGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BEGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BEGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEGRXUCEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.45

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

15.48

-11.28

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEGRX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEGRXUCEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.52

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.72

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.70

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.69

-0.65

Drawdowns

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEGRX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGRX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEGRXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.56%

-35.33%

-38.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-8.96%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-15.64%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-25.24%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.11%

-35.33%

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.25%

-0.68%

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-4.87%

-31.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

1.99%

+1.20%

Volatility

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) is 2.49%, while USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that BEGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEGRXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

3.72%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

9.72%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

12.27%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

15.27%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.50%

+0.13%

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEGRX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEGRX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

BEGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than UCEQX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEGRX
Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund
6.85%6.86%6.89%6.23%9.91%6.83%3.36%2.62%9.94%3.43%6.10%8.90%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.46%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEGRX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCEQX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to BEGRX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGRX dropped -73.56% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEGRX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer