BEGRX vs. MDGCX
BEGRX (Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BEGRX returned 9.25%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for MDGCX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEGRX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.
Performance
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEGRX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 17.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BEGRX has underperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.
BEGRX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
MDGCX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEGRX Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund | 9.68% | 25.64% | 8.64% | 15.40% | -11.70% | 16.64% | 4.07% | 22.57% | -8.84% | 12.30% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 17.89% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 25.54% | -11.73% | 23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEGRX and MDGCX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 1994 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BEGRX and MDGCX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEGRX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank
BEGRX
MDGCX
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEGRX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.15 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 15.40 | -8.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEGRX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGRX and MDGCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEGRX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.56% | -48.25% | -25.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -8.07% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.15% | -21.46% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -26.68% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.11% | -34.87% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.60% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -9.89% | -26.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.17% | +1.25% |
Volatility
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) is 2.62%, while BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that BEGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEGRX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 4.40% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 11.62% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 14.00% | -3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 16.34% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 17.14% | -0.61% |
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEGRX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEGRX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison
BEGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, less than MDGCX's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEGRX Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund | 6.25% | 6.86% | 6.89% | 6.23% | 9.91% | 6.83% | 3.36% | 2.62% | 9.94% | 3.43% | 6.10% | 8.90% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 7.56% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEGRX and MDGCX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDGCX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to BEGRX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGRX dropped -73.56% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.
MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEGRX and MDGCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer