BEG vs. SCDL
BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BEG is actively managed, while SCDL is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.
Performance
BEG vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEG achieves a 552.25% return, which is significantly higher than SCDL's 37.06% return.
BEG
- 1D
- -9.38%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- 552.25%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 37.06%
- 6M
- 35.80%
- 1Y
- 50.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
BEG vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 552.25% | -5.55% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 37.06% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEG and SCDL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEG vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank
BEG
SCDL
BEG vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 24.77 | 0.53 | +24.24 |
Drawdowns
BEG vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEG drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, which is greater than SCDL's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEG and SCDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -34.87% | -24.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -2.79% | -11.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.14% | -11.96% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility
BEG vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.85% | 21.66% | +192.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 213.85% | 29.02% | +184.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.85% | 28.89% | +184.96% |
BEG vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEG vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BEG nor SCDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BEG and SCDL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
BEG and SCDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BEG and 0.95% for SCDL.
Find the right allocation for BEG and SCDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer