BEG vs. CRMG
BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
BEG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEG achieves a 658.88% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.
BEG
- 1D
- -13.66%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 658.88%
- 6M
- 577.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -29.64%
- YTD
- -71.26%
- 6M
- -71.01%
- 1Y
- -73.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 658.88% | 1.77% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -71.26% | 8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEG and CRMG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
BEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
BEG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEG drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEG and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -79.83% | +19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.66% | -78.97% | +65.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.74% | -39.18% | +22.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.41% | — |
Volatility
BEG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 212.91% | 76.12% | +136.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 212.91% | 75.39% | +137.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 212.91% | 75.39% | +137.52% |
BEG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BEG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
BEG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BEG nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BEG and CRMG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
BEG and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for BEG and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer