BEDZ vs. DWUS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS).

BEDZ and DWUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BEDZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 21, 2021. DWUS is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Dec 26, 2019.

Performance

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	-6.46%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	6.49%
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	-5.24%	12.75%	20.26%	20.62%	-17.89%	11.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a -6.46% return, which is significantly lower than DWUS's -5.24% return.

BEDZ

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: -6.46%
• 6M: -4.76%
• 1Y: 10.13%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DWUS

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -5.46%
• YTD: -5.24%
• 6M: -5.54%
• 1Y: 9.65%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than DWUS's 1.17% expense ratio.

DWUS

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF

BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

Return for Risk

BEDZ vs. DWUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DWUS

DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 28
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEDZ	DWUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.48	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	0.80	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.11	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	0.88	-0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	3.07	-1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the DWUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEDZ and DWUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEDZ	DWUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.48	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.57	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between BEDZ and DWUS is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Dividend Comparison

BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than DWUS's 0.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.47%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	0.03%	0.03%	0.18%	0.29%	0.89%	0.35%	0.08%

Drawdowns

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, roughly equal to the maximum DWUS drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and DWUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDZ	DWUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.70%	-30.47%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.24%	-11.98%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.90%	-8.43%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-7.00%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	3.42%	+2.11%

Volatility

BEDZ vs. DWUS - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) at 5.90%. This indicates that BEDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEDZ	DWUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	5.90%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.40%	12.75%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.68%	20.30%	+5.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.97%	18.79%	+6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.97%	22.01%	+2.96%