BEDY vs. YCS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). BEDY is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Their -0.24 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

BEDY vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.29% return.

BEDY

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 11.84%
• YTD: 16.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

YCS

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.27%
• 6M: 9.33%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 1Y: 25.05%
• 3Y*: 17.34%
• 5Y*: 23.55%
• 10Y*: 13.76%
• ALL TIME*: 6.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	$1.95M	$1.66M	$1.56M
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	$1.53M	$2.43M	$1.42M

BEDY vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	16.02%	1.45%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	7.29%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDY and YCS is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	-0.24

Return for Risk

BEDY vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEDY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 56
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEDY vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEDY	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.52	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.93	—

Drawdowns

BEDY vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDY	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-49.56%	+43.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-5.68%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-19.75%	+18.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDY	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.77%	16.85%	-5.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.77%	21.16%	-9.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.77%	18.61%	-6.84%

BEDY vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEDY vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.87%	0.09%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDY and YCS in my portfolio?

BEDY and YCS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEDY or YCS?

On fees, BEDY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDY or YCS?

BEDY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDY or YCS?

BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between BEDY and YCS?

BEDY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 1.00% for YCS.