BEDY vs. USO
BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. BEDY is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
BEDY vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 60.87% return.
BEDY
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -21.05%
- YTD
- 60.87%
- 6M
- 58.26%
- 1Y
- 45.61%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
BEDY vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 12.52% | 1.45% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 60.87% | -3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDY and USO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDY vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
BEDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USO
BEDY vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDY vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -98.19% | +91.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -88.16% | +87.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -75.31% | +74.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.02% | — |
Volatility
BEDY vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 44.35% | -32.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 36.32% | -24.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 39.02% | -26.91% |
BEDY vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDY vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.29% | 0.09% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDY and USO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEDY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEDY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
BEDY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for BEDY and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer