BEDY vs. TRPA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while TRPA is a CLO fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for TRPA.

Performance

BEDY vs. TRPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than TRPA's 2.30% return.

BEDY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRPA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 5.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEDY vs. TRPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	12.52%	1.45%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	2.30%	0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDY and TRPA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

BEDY vs. TRPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEDY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TRPA

TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 91
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEDY vs. TRPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEDY	TRPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	36.94	—

Drawdowns

BEDY vs. TRPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, which is greater than TRPA's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and TRPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDY	TRPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-0.61%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-0.09%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDY	TRPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	2.31%	+9.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.11%	2.33%	+9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.11%	2.33%	+9.78%

BEDY vs. TRPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRPA's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEDY vs. TRPA - Dividend Comparison

BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than TRPA's 5.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.29%	0.09%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	5.17%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDY and TRPA in my portfolio?

BEDY and TRPA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEDY or TRPA?

On fees, TRPA is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDY or TRPA?

TRPA is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDY or TRPA?

TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 3.29% for BEDY.

What is the main difference between BEDY and TRPA?

BEDY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TRPA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.24% for TRPA.