BE vs. XAR
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) is a stock, while XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Over the past 5 years, BE returned 59.08%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for XAR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 199.48% return, which is significantly higher than XAR's 16.10% return.
BE
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -14.23%
- YTD
- 199.48%
- 6M
- 173.97%
- 1Y
- 1,085.51%
- 3Y*
- 145.16%
- 5Y*
- 59.08%
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
BE vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 199.48% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and XAR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.45 |
The correlation between BE and XAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
BE
XAR
BE vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BE | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.25 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.53 | 2.43 | +21.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.01 | 6.81 | +66.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BE vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -46.37% | -46.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -17.22% | -28.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | -19.73% | -33.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -32.40% | -43.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -4.32% | -11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -6.78% | -45.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.78% | 6.13% | +8.65% |
Volatility
BE vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 27.74% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 11.46%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.74% | 11.46% | +16.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.65% | 23.56% | +52.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.62% | 27.85% | +79.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.95% | 23.66% | +62.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.68% | 24.74% | +70.94% |
Dividends
BE vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and XAR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to XAR (11.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs XAR's -46.37%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer