BE vs. WMT
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, BE returned 58.49%/yr vs 22.47%/yr for WMT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 191.83% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 7.98% return.
BE
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 191.83%
- 6M
- 126.83%
- 1Y
- 1,064.23%
- 3Y*
- 155.85%
- 5Y*
- 58.49%
- 10Y*
- —
WMT
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
BE vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 191.83% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -60.08% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 7.98% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | 7.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and WMT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.12 |
The correlation between BE and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BE:
$81.07B
WMT:
$958.52B
BE:
$0.02
WMT:
$2.88
BE:
11.04K
WMT:
41.62
BE:
27.20
WMT:
1.32
BE:
87.98
WMT:
10.16
BE:
$2.45B
WMT:
$725.31B
BE:
$761.91M
WMT:
$181.16B
BE:
$88.83M
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
BE
WMT
BE vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.20 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.42 | 1.53 | +21.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.60 | 5.02 | +68.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06 | 1.02 | +9.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.04 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.64 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
BE vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -77.14% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -15.75% | -30.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | -21.93% | -31.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -25.74% | -50.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -10.71% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.00% | -14.63% | -37.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.59% | 4.79% | +9.80% |
Volatility
BE vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 26.19% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 10.26%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.19% | 10.26% | +15.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.40% | 18.59% | +56.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.17% | 23.72% | +83.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.83% | 21.68% | +64.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.94% | 21.73% | +73.21% |
Dividends
BE vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.81% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
BE vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BE vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
WMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
WMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
WMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and WMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (26.19%) compared to WMT (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs WMT's -77.14%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.06 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer