BE vs. MU
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BE returned 56.68%/yr vs 61.18%/yr for MU. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BE vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 136.86% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return.
BE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -28.91%
- 6M
- 35.96%
- YTD
- 136.86%
- 1Y
- 450.44%
- 3Y*
- 126.68%
- 5Y*
- 56.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.88%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.07B | $3.66B | $3.50B | |
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B |
BE vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 136.86% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -40.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and MU is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between BE and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BE:
$60.62B
MU:
$929.52B
BE:
$0.86
MU:
$44.42
BE:
239.80
MU:
18.53
BE:
18.87
MU:
10.36
BE:
41.28
MU:
9.33
BE:
$3.11B
MU:
$90.27B
BE:
$972.69M
MU:
$65.51B
BE:
$309.03M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
BE
MU
BE vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BE | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.63 | 16.92 | -8.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.90 | 64.08 | -39.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BE vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -98.25% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.65% | -39.10% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.65% | -57.63% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -57.63% | -18.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.49% | -32.17% | -8.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -58.02% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 10.31% | +7.89% |
Volatility
BE vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 42.49% compared to Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) at 31.11%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.49% | 31.11% | +11.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 84.76% | 67.64% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.50% | 81.13% | +33.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.73% | 56.32% | +32.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.71% | 51.42% | +45.29% |
Dividends
BE vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
BE vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BE vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 355.57M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 182.24M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 196.29M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and MU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (42.49%) compared to MU (31.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 3.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer