BE vs. MTSI
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while MTSI operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BE returned 67.90%/yr vs 46.16%/yr for MTSI. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 278.54% return, which is significantly higher than MTSI's 128.52% return.
BE
- 1D
- 15.41%
- 1M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 278.54%
- 6M
- 270.31%
- 1Y
- 1,412.23%
- 3Y*
- 167.62%
- 5Y*
- 67.90%
- 10Y*
- —
MTSI
- 1D
- 6.62%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 128.52%
- 6M
- 124.41%
- 1Y
- 185.72%
- 3Y*
- 85.93%
- 5Y*
- 46.16%
- 10Y*
- 27.43%
BE vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 278.54% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 128.52% | 31.85% | 39.76% | 47.59% | -19.57% | 42.26% | 106.92% | 83.32% | -35.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and MTSI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
BE:
$105.16B
MTSI:
$30.19B
BE:
$0.02
MTSI:
$2.33
BE:
14.32K
MTSI:
168.14
BE:
35.28
MTSI:
27.68
BE:
114.12
MTSI:
21.30
BE:
$2.45B
MTSI:
$1.07B
BE:
$761.91M
MTSI:
$594.25M
BE:
$88.83M
MTSI:
$245.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank
BE
MTSI
BE vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BE | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.50 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 31.49 | 9.76 | +21.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 97.57 | 24.96 | +72.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BE vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than MTSI's maximum drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and MTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -80.78% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -19.74% | -26.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | -41.09% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -44.86% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.46% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.82% | -26.18% | -25.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.80% | 7.70% | +7.10% |
Volatility
BE vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 29.00% compared to MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) at 20.95%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.00% | 20.95% | +8.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.92% | 40.71% | +34.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.23% | 51.36% | +56.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.25% | 43.84% | +42.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.75% | 52.45% | +43.30% |
Dividends
BE vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison
Neither BE nor MTSI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BE vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BE vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
MTSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
MTSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
MTSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and MTSI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (29.00%) compared to MTSI (20.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs MTSI's -80.78%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.37 vs 3.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and MTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer