BE vs. INFA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and INFA (Informatica Inc.) are both stocks.

Performance

BE vs. INFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Informatica Inc. (INFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BE

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -2.86%
• YTD: 191.83%
• 6M: 126.83%
• 1Y: 1,064.23%
• 3Y*: 155.85%
• 5Y*: 58.49%
• 10Y*: —

INFA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BE vs. INFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	-12.57%
INFA Informatica Inc.	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BE : $81.07B INFA : $7.70B
EPS BE : $0.02 INFA : $0.03
PE Ratio BE : 11.04K INFA : 727.98
PS Ratio BE : 27.20 INFA : 4.53
PB Ratio BE : 87.98 INFA : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) BE : $2.45B INFA : $1.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) BE : $761.91M INFA : $1.36B
EBITDA (TTM) BE : $88.83M INFA : $323.83M

Return for Risk

BE vs. INFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE

BE Risk / Return Rank: 99
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BE vs. INFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Informatica Inc. (INFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BE	INFA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	23.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	73.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BE	INFA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	—	—

Drawdowns

BE vs. INFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than INFA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and INFA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BE	INFA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.54%	0.00%	-92.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.64%	0.00%	-17.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.00%	0.00%	-52.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BE	INFA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	75.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	107.17%	0.00%	+107.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	85.83%	0.00%	+85.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.94%	0.00%	+94.94%

Dividends

BE vs. INFA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BE nor INFA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BE vs. INFA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and Informatica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

INFA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a gross profit of 358.74M and revenue of 439.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

INFA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported an operating income of 60.87M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

INFA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.