PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BE vs. HOOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BE vs. HOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 191.83% return, which is significantly higher than HOOD's -24.81% return.


BE

1D
-3.81%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
191.83%
6M
126.83%
1Y
1,064.23%
3Y*
155.85%
5Y*
58.49%
10Y*

HOOD

1D
3.12%
1M
10.40%
YTD
-24.81%
6M
-37.67%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
108.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BE vs. HOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
191.83%291.22%50.07%-22.59%-12.81%1.29%
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
-24.81%203.54%192.46%56.51%-54.17%-48.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BE and HOOD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021

0.46

The correlation between BE and HOOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BE:

$81.07B

HOOD:

$77.81B

EPS

BE:

$0.02

HOOD:

$2.07

PE Ratio

BE:

11.04K

HOOD:

41.10

PS Ratio

BE:

27.20

HOOD:

19.93

PB Ratio

BE:

87.98

HOOD:

8.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

BE:

$2.45B

HOOD:

$3.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BE:

$761.91M

HOOD:

$2.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

BE:

$88.83M

HOOD:

$1.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BE vs. HOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOD
HOOD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BE vs. HOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEHOODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.09

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

23.42

0.24

+23.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

73.60

0.44

+73.16

BE vs. HOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 10.06, which is higher than the HOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and HOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEHOODDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06

0.20

+9.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.27

+0.09

Drawdowns

BE vs. HOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOD drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and HOOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEHOODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-90.21%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.94%

-57.26%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.42%

-57.26%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.64%

-44.22%

+26.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.00%

-60.95%

+8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.59%

31.25%

-16.66%

Volatility

BE vs. HOOD - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 26.19% compared to Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) at 22.93%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEHOODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.19%

22.93%

+3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.40%

50.49%

+24.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.17%

69.17%

+38.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.83%

74.04%

+11.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.94%

74.04%

+20.90%

Dividends

BE vs. HOOD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BE nor HOOD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BE vs. HOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Robinhood Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
751.05M
359.00M
(BE) Total Revenue
(HOOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BE vs. HOOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and Robinhood Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
30.0%
0
Portfolio components
BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

HOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

HOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

HOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 346.00M and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in a net margin of 96.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BE and HOOD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (26.19%) compared to HOOD (22.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs HOOD's -90.21%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.06 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BE and HOOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer