BDYN vs. VDE
BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDYN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. BDYN is actively managed, while VDE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
BDYN vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 29.27% return.
BDYN
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDE
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 21.26%
- YTD
- 29.27%
- 1Y
- 37.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
BDYN vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 7.89% | 3.61% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.27% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDYN and VDE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.15 |
BDYN vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDYN
VDE
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
BDYN
VDE
-
Industrials
BDYN
VDE
Financial Services
BDYN
VDE
-
Communication Services
BDYN
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
BDYN
VDE
-
Healthcare
BDYN
VDE
-
Energy
BDYN
VDE
Consumer Defensive
BDYN
VDE
-
Utilities
BDYN
VDE
Basic Materials
BDYN
VDE
Real Estate
BDYN
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDYN vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
BDYN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VDE
BDYN vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDYN | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDYN vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDYN | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -74.20% | +63.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -8.54% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -19.91% | +18.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.52% | — |
Volatility
BDYN vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDYN | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 20.84% | -6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 26.25% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 29.91% | -15.28% |
BDYN vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDYN vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than VDE's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 2.02% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.51% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDYN and VDE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDYN.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.02% for BDYN.
BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.09% for VDE.
Find the right allocation for BDYN and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer