BDYN vs. USO
BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BDYN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. BDYN is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
BDYN vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 53.69% return.
BDYN
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -24.57%
- YTD
- 53.69%
- 6M
- 51.41%
- 1Y
- 45.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
BDYN vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 5.84% | 3.61% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 53.69% | -5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDYN and USO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDYN vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
BDYN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USO
BDYN vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDYN | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDYN vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDYN | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -98.19% | +87.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -88.69% | +85.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -75.32% | +73.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.18% | — |
Volatility
BDYN vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDYN | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 43.82% | -28.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 36.38% | -21.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 39.04% | -24.19% |
BDYN vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDYN vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 2.06% | 2.18% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDYN and USO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDYN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDYN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for BDYN and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer