BDYN vs. IVV
BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDYN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. BDYN is actively managed, while IVV is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
BDYN vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 8.13% return.
BDYN
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
BDYN vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 5.84% | 3.61% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.13% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDYN and IVV is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.95 |
BDYN vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDYN
IVV
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
BDYN
IVV
Industrials
BDYN
IVV
Financial Services
BDYN
IVV
Communication Services
BDYN
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
BDYN
IVV
Healthcare
BDYN
IVV
Energy
BDYN
IVV
Consumer Defensive
BDYN
IVV
Utilities
BDYN
IVV
Basic Materials
BDYN
IVV
Real Estate
BDYN
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDYN vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
BDYN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVV
BDYN vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDYN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDYN vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDYN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -55.25% | +44.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -3.20% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -10.76% | +8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
BDYN vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDYN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 12.44% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 16.98% | -2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 18.06% | -3.21% |
BDYN vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDYN vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF | 2.06% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, BDYN and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDYN.
BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.03% for IVV.
Find the right allocation for BDYN and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer