BDX vs. XOM
BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. BDX operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BDX returned 2.80%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for XOM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDX vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDX achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, BDX has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 2.80%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.
BDX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -6.16%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- -7.76%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
BDX vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | -2.86% | -12.61% | -5.38% | -2.67% | 5.08% | 1.88% | -6.75% | 22.20% | 6.61% | 31.24% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 23.81% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDX and XOM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1987 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BDX and XOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BDX:
$41.04B
XOM:
$614.94B
BDX:
$3.99
XOM:
$5.93
BDX:
36.67
XOM:
24.80
BDX:
1.95
XOM:
1.93
BDX:
1.70
XOM:
2.42
BDX:
$21.37B
XOM:
$326.01B
BDX:
$9.93B
XOM:
$83.11B
BDX:
$4.16B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDX vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
BDX
XOM
BDX vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDX | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 2.45 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 6.56 | -5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDX vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDX and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDX | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.17% | -62.40% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.73% | -15.69% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.06% | -18.92% | -21.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.06% | -20.51% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.06% | -61.34% | +21.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.41% | -13.68% | -16.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.58% | -10.20% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.82% | 5.84% | +3.98% |
Volatility
BDX vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is 6.32%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that BDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDX | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 9.08% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 20.51% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.20% | 24.51% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 26.77% | -3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 28.20% | -4.61% |
Dividends
BDX vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
BDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than XOM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | 2.56% | 2.15% | 1.71% | 1.51% | 1.38% | 1.34% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.60% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.78% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
BDX vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Becton, Dickinson and Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDX vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
BDX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 4.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
BDX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported an operating income of 94.00M and revenue of 4.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
BDX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a net income of -311.00M and revenue of 4.71B, resulting in a net margin of -6.6%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDX and XOM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to BDX (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDX dropped -51.17% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDX and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer