PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDX vs. ITW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDX vs. ITW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDX achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than ITW's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BDX has underperformed ITW with an annualized return of 2.97%, while ITW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


BDX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
1.32%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
-7.20%
5Y*
-2.73%
10Y*
2.97%

ITW

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.02%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDX vs. ITW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
-1.06%-12.61%-5.38%-2.67%5.08%1.88%-6.75%22.20%6.61%31.24%
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
3.12%-0.43%-0.97%21.56%-8.46%23.60%16.42%45.60%-22.10%38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BDX and ITW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987

0.33

The correlation between BDX and ITW shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BDX:

$3.99

ITW:

$14.33

PE Ratio

BDX:

37.61

ITW:

17.61

PS Ratio

BDX:

2.00

ITW:

3.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDX:

$21.37B

ITW:

$16.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDX:

$9.93B

ITW:

$7.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

BDX:

$4.16B

ITW:

$4.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDX vs. ITW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDX
BDX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ITW
ITW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDX vs. ITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) and Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDXITWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.06

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.26

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

0.59

+0.74

BDX vs. ITW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the ITW Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDX and ITW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDXITWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.22

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.19

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.48

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.51

-0.09

Drawdowns

BDX vs. ITW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum ITW drawdown of -54.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDX and ITW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDXITWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-54.90%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.73%

-17.44%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.06%

-20.63%

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.06%

-28.05%

-12.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.06%

-37.85%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.13%

-15.22%

-13.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-9.83%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.52%

7.75%

+1.77%

Volatility

BDX vs. ITW - Volatility Comparison

Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) at 3.43%. This indicates that BDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDXITWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

3.43%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

15.75%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.03%

20.29%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

21.07%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.58%

23.81%

-0.23%

Dividends

BDX vs. ITW - Dividend Comparison

BDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than ITW's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
2.34%2.15%1.71%1.51%1.38%1.34%1.28%1.14%1.34%1.37%1.64%1.60%
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
2.51%2.53%2.29%2.07%2.30%1.91%2.17%2.30%2.81%1.71%1.96%2.23%

Financials

BDX vs. ITW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Becton, Dickinson and Company and Illinois Tool Works Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.71B
4.02B
(BDX) Total Revenue
(ITW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDX vs. ITW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Becton, Dickinson and Company and Illinois Tool Works Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
45.7%
43.8%
Portfolio components
BDX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 4.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

ITW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 4.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

BDX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported an operating income of 94.00M and revenue of 4.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

ITW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.

BDX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Becton, Dickinson and Company reported a net income of -311.00M and revenue of 4.71B, resulting in a net margin of -6.6%.

ITW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a net income of 768.00M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDX and ITW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDX has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to ITW (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDX dropped -51.17% vs ITW's -54.90%.

BDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDX and ITW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer