BDVG vs. VMAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BDVG (iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF) and VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BDVG returned 22.84% vs 29.63% for VMAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BDVG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VMAX.

Performance

BDVG vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVG achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 15.44% return.

BDVG

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 12.77%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VMAX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 15.44%
• 6M: 14.38%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVG vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF	12.77%	13.81%	11.75%	4.10%
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF	15.44%	15.65%	15.89%	5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BDVG and VMAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.83

The correlation between BDVG and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

BDVG vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDVG	VMAX
Industrials	18.6%	5.5%
Technology	18.2%	13.3%
Financial Services	17.0%	32.4%
Consumer Defensive	11.6%	3.7%
Energy	10.5%	11.0%
Healthcare	9.8%	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	3.7%
Basic Materials	3.7%	2.8%
Utilities	3.1%	5.3%
Real Estate	1.3%	4.4%
Communication Services	0.6%	6.6%

Return for Risk

BDVG vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVG

BDVG Risk / Return Rank: 76
BDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

VMAX

VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 85
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVG vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDVG	VMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.42	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.30	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	6.04	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.03	21.18	-8.15

BDVG vs. VMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDVG Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the VMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDVG and VMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDVG vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVG drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum VMAX drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVG and VMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDVG	VMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.46%	-19.05%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-4.93%	-1.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-0.39%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-2.52%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	1.40%	+0.36%

Volatility

BDVG vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison

iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) at 3.17%. This indicates that BDVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDVG	VMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	3.17%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.77%	8.83%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.08%	12.31%	-2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.95%	15.41%	-3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.95%	15.41%	-3.46%

BDVG vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDVG vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison

BDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than VMAX's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF	1.52%	1.75%	1.69%	0.95%
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF	1.85%	2.14%	1.95%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDVG and VMAX in my portfolio?

BDVG and VMAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDVG or VMAX?

BDVG has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to VMAX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDVG dropped -14.46% vs VMAX's -19.05%.

Which ETF is better, BDVG or VMAX?

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.63% vs 22.84% for BDVG. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDVG or VMAX?

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 22.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDVG or VMAX?

VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDVG or VMAX?

VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.52% for BDVG.

What is the main difference between BDVG and VMAX?

They also come from different issuers: iMGP and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BDVG and 0.29% for VMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.