BDRY vs. MJUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS).
BDRY and MJUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDRY is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. MJUS is an actively managed fund by ETFMG. It was launched on May 12, 2021.
Performance
BDRY vs. MJUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BDRY vs. MJUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 17.73% | 44.24% | -47.40% | 25.79% | -68.84% | 23.08% |
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.88% | -17.41% | -66.89% | -39.41% |
Returns By Period
BDRY
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -15.51%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 6M
- 36.21%
- 1Y
- 58.85%
- 3Y*
- 0.74%
- 5Y*
- -10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
MJUS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDRY vs. MJUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDRY has a 3.76% expense ratio, which is higher than MJUS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BDRY vs. MJUS — Risk / Return Rank
BDRY
MJUS
BDRY vs. MJUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDRY | MJUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDRY | MJUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between BDRY and MJUS is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BDRY vs. MJUS - Dividend Comparison
Neither BDRY nor MJUS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BDRY vs. MJUS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDRY | MJUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.13% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.11% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility
BDRY vs. MJUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BDRY | MJUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.07% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.12% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.97% | — | — |