PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDRY vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDRY achieves a 53.02% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 11.96% return.


BDRY

1D
0.45%
1M
9.37%
6M
16.39%
YTD
53.02%
1Y
79.89%
3Y*
39.44%
5Y*
-12.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.35%

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.00%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$397.41K$463.93K$806.29K
$0.00$9.78K$53.76K

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BDRY
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF
53.02%44.24%-47.40%25.79%-64.02%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
11.96%19.65%3.13%-9.58%-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BDRY and ISCMF is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDRY vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDRY
BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BDRYISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.81

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

1.59

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

4.79

+5.51

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDRY Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDRY and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDRY drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDRY and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDRYISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.16%

-25.42%

-63.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.60%

-13.68%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.71%

-13.68%

-56.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.67%

-13.68%

-53.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.58%

-13.31%

-45.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

4.53%

+3.39%

Volatility

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 9.30%. This indicates that BDRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDRYISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.70%

9.30%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.10%

17.32%

+10.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.11%

19.57%

+20.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.80%

14.74%

+45.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.13%

14.74%

+47.39%

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDRY has a 3.76% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDRY vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BDRY nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BDRY and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDRY has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to ISCMF (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDRY dropped -89.16% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 3-year performance, BDRY leads with 39.44% vs 10.24% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 39.44% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

BDRY and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.76% for BDRY and 0.19% for ISCMF.

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDRY and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer