BDRY vs. IPAY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) and IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index, while IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDRY returned -12.39%/yr vs -6.25%/yr for IPAY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDRY charges 3.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IPAY.

Performance

BDRY vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDRY achieves a 44.24% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -3.78% return.

BDRY

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 4.29%
• 6M: 33.44%
• YTD: 44.24%
• 1Y: 74.48%
• 3Y*: 37.75%
• 5Y*: -12.39%
• 10Y*: —

IPAY

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 10.70%
• 6M: -1.75%
• YTD: -3.78%
• 1Y: -15.47%
• 3Y*: 4.23%
• 5Y*: -6.25%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDRY vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	44.24%	44.24%	-47.40%	25.79%	-68.84%	282.99%	-50.16%	-15.92%	-27.66%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-3.78%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-32.38%	-12.72%	34.22%	41.80%	-7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BDRY and IPAY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018	0.03

Return for Risk

BDRY vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDRY

BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 68
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 66

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDRY vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDRY	IPAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	-0.63	+2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	-0.73	+3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.91	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	-0.50	+3.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	-0.85	+10.28

BDRY vs. IPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the IPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDRY and IPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDRY vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDRY drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, which is greater than IPAY's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDRY and IPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDRY	IPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.16%	-51.75%	-37.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.60%	-31.31%	+9.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.71%	-32.74%	-36.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.16%	-51.49%	-37.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.53%	-30.34%	-39.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.52%	-16.87%	-41.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.92%	18.27%	-10.35%

Volatility

BDRY vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) at 7.71%. This indicates that BDRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDRY	IPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	7.71%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.47%	19.76%	+9.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.13%	24.50%	+16.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.91%	26.31%	+33.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.24%	25.38%	+36.86%

BDRY vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDRY has a 3.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDRY vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison

BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.82%	0.79%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDRY and IPAY in my portfolio?

BDRY and IPAY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDRY or IPAY?

BDRY has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to IPAY (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDRY dropped -89.16% vs IPAY's -51.75%.

Which ETF is better, BDRY or IPAY?

On 5-year performance, IPAY leads with -6.25% vs -12.39% for BDRY. On fees, IPAY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDRY or IPAY?

Over the 5-year period, IPAY has performed better with a -6.25% return vs -12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDRY or IPAY?

IPAY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDRY or IPAY?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.

What is the main difference between BDRY and IPAY?

BDRY is categorized as Commodities, while IPAY is Technology Equities. BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index, while IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index. Their fees differ too: 3.76% for BDRY and 0.75% for IPAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.