BDRBF vs. ENVA
BDRBF (Bombardier Inc) and ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) are both stocks. BDRBF operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ENVA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, BDRBF returned 18.82%/yr vs 36.51%/yr for ENVA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDRBF achieves a 28.69% return, which is significantly higher than ENVA's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BDRBF has underperformed ENVA with an annualized return of 18.82%, while ENVA has yielded a comparatively higher 36.51% annualized return.
BDRBF
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 28.69%
- 6M
- 32.96%
- 1Y
- 200.14%
- 3Y*
- 70.44%
- 5Y*
- 58.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.82%
ENVA
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 24.70%
- 1Y
- 79.61%
- 3Y*
- 49.29%
- 5Y*
- 35.80%
- 10Y*
- 36.51%
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDRBF Bombardier Inc | 28.69% | 149.94% | 69.55% | 3.91% | 16.97% | 248.95% | -74.27% | -0.00% | -38.75% | 49.07% |
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 7.39% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 44.28% | -6.32% | 65.36% | 2.95% | 23.64% | 28.03% | 21.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDRBF and ENVA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.28 |
The correlation between BDRBF and ENVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BDRBF:
$21.99B
ENVA:
$4.45B
BDRBF:
$9.34
ENVA:
$12.29
BDRBF:
23.42
ENVA:
13.73
BDRBF:
0.63
ENVA:
0.74
BDRBF:
2.28
ENVA:
1.37
BDRBF:
$9.61B
ENVA:
$3.28B
BDRBF:
$1.87B
ENVA:
$1.23B
BDRBF:
$1.78B
ENVA:
$456.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDRBF vs. ENVA — Risk / Return Rank
BDRBF
ENVA
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bombardier Inc (BDRBF) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDRBF | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.30 | 3.23 | +7.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.80 | 8.34 | +22.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDRBF | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82 | 2.10 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.89 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.74 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.33 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDRBF drawdown since its inception was -94.89%, which is greater than ENVA's maximum drawdown of -81.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDRBF and ENVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDRBF | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.89% | -81.56% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | -24.75% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.34% | -37.01% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.84% | -42.84% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.89% | -77.57% | -17.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.90% | -3.48% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.05% | -29.61% | -15.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 9.57% | -3.04% |
Volatility
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Volatility Comparison
Bombardier Inc (BDRBF) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) at 10.31%. This indicates that BDRBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDRBF | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 10.31% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.34% | 28.13% | +12.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 38.07% | +14.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.91% | 40.29% | +16.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.33% | 49.25% | +13.08% |
Dividends
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither BDRBF nor ENVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bombardier Inc and Enova International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDRBF vs. ENVA - Profitability Comparison
BDRBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a gross profit of 246.54M and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
ENVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 875.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BDRBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported an operating income of 175.53M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
ENVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.11M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
BDRBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a net income of 52.27M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
ENVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDRBF and ENVA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDRBF has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to ENVA (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDRBF dropped -94.89% vs ENVA's -81.56%.
BDRBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDRBF and ENVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer