BDRBF vs. ENVA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bombardier Inc (BDRBF) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA).

Performance

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bombardier Inc (BDRBF) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDRBF Bombardier Inc	8.91%	149.94%	69.55%	3.91%	16.97%	248.95%	-74.27%	-0.00%	-38.75%	49.07%
ENVA Enova International, Inc.	-12.92%	63.95%	73.19%	44.28%	-6.32%	65.36%	2.95%	23.64%	28.03%	21.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BDRBF : $18.64B ENVA : $3.61B
EPS BDRBF : $9.26 ENVA : $11.58
PE Ratio BDRBF : 19.98 ENVA : 11.82
PEG Ratio BDRBF : 0.54 ENVA : 0.64
PS Ratio BDRBF : 1.94 ENVA : 1.16
Total Revenue (TTM) BDRBF : $9.56B ENVA : $3.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) BDRBF : $1.91B ENVA : $1.58B
EBITDA (TTM) BDRBF : $1.75B ENVA : $529.82M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDRBF achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than ENVA's -12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, BDRBF has underperformed ENVA with an annualized return of 21.34%, while ENVA has yielded a comparatively higher 36.63% annualized return.

BDRBF

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -8.46%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 6M: 31.27%
• 1Y: 226.17%
• 3Y*: 50.46%
• 5Y*: 57.11%
• 10Y*: 21.34%

ENVA

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: -12.92%
• 6M: 21.99%
• 1Y: 37.00%
• 3Y*: 45.51%
• 5Y*: 30.56%
• 10Y*: 36.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BDRBF vs. ENVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDRBF

BDRBF Risk / Return Rank: 98
BDRBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BDRBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BDRBF Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BDRBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BDRBF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ENVA

ENVA Risk / Return Rank: 69
ENVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ENVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ENVA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ENVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ENVA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bombardier Inc (BDRBF) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDRBF	ENVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.46	0.88	+3.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	1.42	+2.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.19	+0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.68	1.69	+10.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.94	4.20	+34.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDRBF Sharpe Ratio is 4.46, which is higher than the ENVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDRBF and ENVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDRBF	ENVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.46	0.88	+3.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.76	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.73	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.30	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between BDRBF and ENVA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BDRBF nor ENVA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDRBF drawdown since its inception was -94.89%, which is greater than ENVA's maximum drawdown of -81.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDRBF and ENVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDRBF	ENVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.89%	-81.56%	-13.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.56%	-24.75%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.84%	-42.84%	-25.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.89%	-77.57%	-17.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-20.58%	+10.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.72%	-29.97%	-15.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.87%	9.94%	-4.07%

Volatility

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Volatility Comparison

Bombardier Inc (BDRBF) has a higher volatility of 16.84% compared to Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) at 8.54%. This indicates that BDRBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDRBF	ENVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.84%	8.54%	+8.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.37%	29.02%	+7.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.10%	42.20%	+8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.97%	40.28%	+15.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.21%	50.08%	+12.13%

Financials

BDRBF vs. ENVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bombardier Inc and Enova International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BDRBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a gross profit of 751.00M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.

ENVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 501.89M and revenue of 839.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.

BDRBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bombardier Inc reported an operating income of 481.00M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

ENVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.65M and revenue of 839.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

BDRBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

ENVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 78.98M and revenue of 839.39M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.