PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDOIX vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (BDOIX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDOIX achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BDOIX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 9.56%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


BDOIX

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.14%
YTD
14.99%
6M
17.33%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.56%

MTUM

1D
-1.10%
1M
11.94%
YTD
30.30%
6M
29.99%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
34.34%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDOIX
iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund
14.99%32.57%5.19%15.25%-16.39%7.59%10.72%21.19%-13.94%26.33%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.30%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BDOIX and MTUM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.68

The correlation between BDOIX and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDOIX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDOIX
BDOIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BDOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BDOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (BDOIX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDOIXMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.53

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

14.10

-2.72

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDOIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDOIX and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDOIXMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.14

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.82

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.84

-0.47

Drawdowns

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDOIX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDOIX and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDOIXMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-34.08%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-11.54%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.49%

-20.99%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.25%

-32.28%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-34.08%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.10%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-6.21%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.89%

-0.01%

Volatility

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (BDOIX) is 5.16%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that BDOIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDOIXMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

7.67%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

16.51%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

19.08%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

20.60%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

21.03%

-4.83%

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BDOIX and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BDOIX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

BDOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDOIX
iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund
2.55%3.08%2.89%2.99%2.91%3.07%2.00%3.08%3.33%1.83%3.57%3.94%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDOIX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to BDOIX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDOIX dropped -35.10% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

BDOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDOIX and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer