BDNNY vs. LRCX
BDNNY (Boliden AB ADR) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. BDNNY operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BDNNY returned 16.00%/yr vs 48.36%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDNNY achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 117.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BDNNY has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 16.00%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.36% annualized return.
BDNNY
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 91.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.00%
LRCX
- 1D
- -9.33%
- 1M
- 21.69%
- YTD
- 117.34%
- 6M
- 112.40%
- 1Y
- 307.58%
- 3Y*
- 84.36%
- 5Y*
- 43.85%
- 10Y*
- 48.36%
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDNNY Boliden AB ADR | 4.10% | 99.12% | -9.06% | -10.79% | 2.01% | 16.35% | 40.33% | 16.52% | -32.29% | 36.21% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 117.34% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDNNY and LRCX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, BDNNY and LRCX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BDNNY:
$16.00B
LRCX:
$468.91B
BDNNY:
SEK 77.44
LRCX:
$5.29
BDNNY:
14.00
LRCX:
70.23
BDNNY:
1.32
LRCX:
5.31
BDNNY:
1.55
LRCX:
21.73
BDNNY:
1.90
LRCX:
44.30
BDNNY:
SEK 99.33B
LRCX:
$21.68B
BDNNY:
SEK 17.63B
LRCX:
$10.84B
BDNNY:
SEK 25.40B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDNNY vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
BDNNY
LRCX
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boliden AB ADR (BDNNY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDNNY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.61 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 15.49 | -13.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 51.63 | -45.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDNNY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDNNY and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDNNY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -87.90% | +32.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.97% | -20.01% | -19.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.97% | -47.10% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.71% | -56.39% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.33% | -56.39% | +1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.37% | -9.33% | -19.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -28.15% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 5.99% | +9.06% |
Volatility
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boliden AB ADR (BDNNY) is 17.18%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that BDNNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDNNY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.18% | 24.10% | -6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.56% | 44.78% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.81% | 54.30% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.93% | 46.97% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.12% | 45.11% | +4.01% |
Dividends
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
BDNNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than LRCX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDNNY Boliden AB ADR | 2.12% | 0.00% | 2.62% | 8.16% | 7.07% | 6.73% | 1.91% | 5.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boliden AB ADR and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDNNY vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
BDNNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boliden AB ADR reported a gross profit of 5.62B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
BDNNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boliden AB ADR reported an operating income of 5.25B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.9%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
BDNNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boliden AB ADR reported a net income of 3.82B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDNNY and LRCX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (24.10%) compared to BDNNY (17.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDNNY dropped -55.33% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDNNY and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer