BDGS vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BDGS is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, BDGS returned 13.85% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDGS charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

BDGS vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 13.93%
• YTD: 47.92%
• 6M: 46.01%
• 1Y: 58.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDGS vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	1.10%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	47.92%	12.95%	-6.17%	8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BDGS and NRSH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.52

The correlation between BDGS and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

BDGS vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDGS	NRSH
Technology	37.4%	35.5%
Communication Services	16.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	-
Financial Services	9.3%	-
Healthcare	7.5%	-
Industrials	6.6%	58.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	-
Energy	2.6%	2.5%
Utilities	1.9%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

BDGS vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDGS vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDGS	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.42	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.11	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.40	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	5.40	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.47	16.86	-0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDGS vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDGS Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDGS and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDGS	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.42	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	1.11	+0.65

Drawdowns

BDGS vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDGS	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-24.01%	+14.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-10.94%	+6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	0.00%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-5.62%	+4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	3.50%	-2.66%

Volatility

BDGS vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) is 1.14%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that BDGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDGS	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	9.21%	-8.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.74%	20.27%	-15.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.08%	24.44%	-18.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.21%	21.54%	-13.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.21%	21.54%	-13.33%

BDGS vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDGS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDGS vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.28%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDGS and NRSH in my portfolio?

BDGS and NRSH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDGS or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDGS dropped -9.12% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, BDGS or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 13.85% for BDGS. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDGS or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDGS or NRSH?

NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDGS or NRSH?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.

What is the main difference between BDGS and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: Bridges and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDGS and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.