BDGI.TO vs. CAH
BDGI.TO (Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.) and CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) are both stocks. BDGI.TO operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BDGI.TO returned 17.54%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for CAH. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BDGI.TO is traded in CAD, while CAH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CAH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDGI.TO achieves a 24.90% return, which is significantly higher than CAH's 11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BDGI.TO has outperformed CAH with an annualized return of 17.54%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively lower 15.30% annualized return.
BDGI.TO
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 12.52%
- YTD
- 24.90%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 101.85%
- 3Y*
- 53.56%
- 5Y*
- 20.62%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
CAH
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 22.66%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 44.34%
- 3Y*
- 40.90%
- 5Y*
- 37.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGI.TO Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. | 24.90% | 106.79% | -10.29% | 56.01% | -14.16% | -14.97% | 10.27% | 10.51% | 20.89% | -14.08% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 11.80% | 68.20% | 29.09% | 30.95% | 63.84% | -0.45% | 7.48% | 13.18% | -18.15% | -18.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDGI.TO and CAH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.09 |
The correlation between BDGI.TO and CAH shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BDGI.TO:
CA$3.07B
CAH:
$52.83B
BDGI.TO:
$2.01
CAH:
$6.55
BDGI.TO:
32.35
CAH:
34.17
BDGI.TO:
0.90
CAH:
0.81
BDGI.TO:
2.30
CAH:
0.21
BDGI.TO:
$955.05M
CAH:
$250.55B
BDGI.TO:
$221.07M
CAH:
$9.23B
BDGI.TO:
$178.82M
CAH:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDGI.TO vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
BDGI.TO
CAH
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDGI.TO | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.32 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 2.19 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 5.92 | +4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.09%, smaller than the maximum CAH drawdown of -67.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGI.TO and CAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDGI.TO | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.09% | -67.64% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -20.33% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.75% | -20.33% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.34% | -21.23% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.09% | -46.65% | -14.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -0.11% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.47% | -26.77% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.16% | 7.51% | +2.65% |
Volatility
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 7.40%. This indicates that BDGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDGI.TO | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 7.40% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.47% | 20.83% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.69% | 30.84% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.50% | 26.05% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.88% | 29.79% | +5.09% |
Dividends
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
BDGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than CAH's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGI.TO Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. | 0.83% | 1.03% | 2.01% | 1.69% | 2.48% | 1.97% | 1.57% | 1.62% | 1.61% | 1.55% | 1.20% | 1.47% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
Financials
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDGI.TO vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison
BDGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a gross profit of 49.86M and revenue of 203.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
BDGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported an operating income of 13.08M and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
BDGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a net income of 862.00K and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDGI.TO and CAH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BDGI.TO and CAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer