BDCZ vs. WNTR
BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. BDCZ is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, BDCZ returned -10.62% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BDCZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCZ achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.
BDCZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- -10.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.90%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.15K | $28.17K | $19.88K | |
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M |
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | -6.58% | -5.92% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCZ and WNTR is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCZ vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
BDCZ
WNTR
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDCZ | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.32 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.71 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 6.87 | -8.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCZ drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCZ and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCZ | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | -42.65% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.80% | -42.65% | +25.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -9.64% | -6.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -20.18% | +12.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.36% | 16.81% | -7.45% |
Volatility
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) is 5.90%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that BDCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCZ | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 14.85% | -8.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 47.43% | -28.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.56% | 54.68% | -32.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 53.42% | -35.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 53.42% | -31.46% |
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCZ vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.12%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | 12.12% | 10.65% | 9.26% | 9.13% | 9.39% | 7.49% | 10.01% | 8.40% | 9.66% | 8.74% | 7.98% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCZ and WNTR have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to BDCZ (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCZ dropped -55.63% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs -10.62% for BDCZ. On fees, BDCZ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BDCZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs -10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BDCZ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 12.12% for BDCZ.
BDCZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: UBS and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDCZ and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCZ and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer