BDCZ vs. FLSP
BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. BDCZ is passively managed, while FLSP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDCZ returned 3.21%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for FLSP. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLSP.
Performance
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCZ achieves a -9.41% return, which is significantly lower than FLSP's 2.12% return.
BDCZ
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -9.41%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
FLSP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | -9.41% | -3.72% | 12.22% | 25.31% | -9.12% | 33.97% | -10.95% | -0.60% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.12% | 15.56% | 11.75% | 3.14% | 0.44% | 11.44% | -15.19% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCZ and FLSP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019 | 0.05 |
The correlation between BDCZ and FLSP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCZ vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank
BDCZ
FLSP
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDCZ | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.32 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.12 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 12.27 | -13.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCZ drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, which is greater than FLSP's maximum drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCZ and FLSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCZ | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | -22.75% | -32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.95% | -4.03% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -6.69% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -9.52% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -1.12% | -17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -6.25% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.56% | 1.35% | +10.21% |
Volatility
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) at 1.78%. This indicates that BDCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCZ | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 1.78% | +6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 6.76% | +10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.61% | 9.05% | +11.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 13.35% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 13.48% | +8.28% |
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCZ vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison
BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than FLSP's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | 11.45% | 10.65% | 9.26% | 9.13% | 9.39% | 7.49% | 10.01% | 8.40% | 9.66% | 8.74% | 7.98% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.60% | 2.65% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 2.18% | 1.19% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCZ and FLSP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCZ has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to FLSP (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCZ dropped -55.63% vs FLSP's -22.75%.
On 5-year performance, FLSP leads with 8.29% vs 3.21% for BDCZ. On fees, FLSP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLSP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.
BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.45%, compared with 2.60% for FLSP.
BDCZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDCZ and 0.65% for FLSP.
FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCZ and FLSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer