PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BDCZ vs. AMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BDCZ vs. AMUB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BDCZ returned 6.23%/yr vs 3.05%/yr for AMUB. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.

Performance

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCZ achieves a -7.98% return, which is significantly lower than AMUB's 16.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BDCZ has outperformed AMUB with an annualized return of 6.23%, while AMUB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.05% annualized return.

BDCZ

1D
-2.73%
1M
-7.44%
YTD
-7.98%
6M
-8.99%
1Y
-10.32%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
6.23%

AMUB

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
16.97%
6M
15.25%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
3.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDCZ
ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN		-7.98%-3.72%12.22%25.31%-9.12%33.97%-10.95%26.00%-7.64%0.40%
AMUB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B		16.97%2.05%15.68%16.89%21.91%28.83%-36.47%-1.78%-19.25%-13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCZ and AMUB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between BDCZ and AMUB has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN

ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B

Often compared with BDCZ:
BDCZ vs. BIZDBDCZ vs. MLPRBDCZ vs. MTCIXBDCZ vs. PBDCBDCZ vs. FEQIXBDCZ vs. HYGBDCZ vs. SMH
Often compared with AMUB:
AMUB vs. UMIAMUB vs. AMLPAMUB vs. IFEDAMUB vs. NLRAMUB vs. AMZAAMUB vs. MVRLAMUB vs. MLPX

Return for Risk

BDCZ vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BDCZ
BDCZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
AMUB
AMUB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
AMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BDCZAMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.51
1.18

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.59
1.69

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.20

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.53

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

4.52

-5.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the AMUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCZ and AMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BDCZAMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

1.18

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.61

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.11

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.00

+0.27

Drawdowns

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCZ drawdown since its inception was -55.63%, smaller than the maximum AMUB drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCZ and AMUB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BDCZAMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.63%

-79.46%

+23.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.95%

-10.37%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-17.22%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.12%

-20.58%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.63%

-78.86%

+23.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.27%

-6.15%

-11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-29.23%

+21.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

3.51%

+7.43%

Volatility

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) at 5.40%. This indicates that BDCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BDCZAMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

5.40%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.17%

9.82%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

13.60%

+6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.80%

20.24%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

27.09%

-5.36%

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDCZ vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison

BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, while AMUB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMUB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BDCZ
ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN		11.28%10.65%9.26%9.13%9.39%7.49%10.01%8.40%9.66%8.74%7.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

BDCZ and AMUB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDCZ has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to AMUB (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCZ dropped -55.63% vs AMUB's -79.46%.

On 10-year performance, BDCZ leads with 6.23% vs 3.05% for AMUB. On fees, AMUB is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, AMUB has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BDCZ has performed better with a 6.23% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMUB is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.

BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.28%, compared with 0.00% for AMUB.

BDCZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while AMUB is MLPs. BDCZ tracks BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDCZ and 0.80% for AMUB.

AMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDCZ and AMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer