PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDCZ vs. AMND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDCZ vs. AMND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BDCZ

1D
-2.73%
1M
-7.44%
YTD
-7.98%
6M
-8.99%
1Y
-10.32%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
6.23%

AMND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCZ vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BDCZ
ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN
-7.98%-3.72%12.22%25.31%-9.12%33.97%22.33%
AMND
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050
0.00%0.00%40.42%13.60%21.27%34.91%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCZ and AMND is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020

0.47

The correlation between BDCZ and AMND shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDCZ vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCZ
BDCZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AMND
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCZ vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDCZAMNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

BDCZ vs. AMND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDCZAMNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

Drawdowns

BDCZ vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDCZAMNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

Volatility

BDCZ vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDCZAMNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

BDCZ vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDCZ vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison

BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, while AMND has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMND
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050
0.00%0.00%5.14%6.56%6.37%7.10%2.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BDCZ
ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN
11.28%10.65%9.26%9.13%9.39%7.49%10.01%8.40%9.66%8.74%7.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDCZ and AMND have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.

BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.28%, compared with 0.00% for AMND.

BDCZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while AMND is Energy Equities. BDCZ tracks BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while AMND tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BDCZ and 0.75% for AMND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDCZ and AMND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer