PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDCX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDCX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.36% return.


BDCX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-8.85%
1Y
-13.87%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.01%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.58%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
-8.64%-10.42%15.32%35.33%-17.67%7.98%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.36%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and XTJL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

0.57

The correlation between BDCX and XTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDCX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCX
BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDCXXTJLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

2.18

-2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.60

3.23

-3.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.48

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

3.22

-3.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

18.27

-19.15

BDCX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCX and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDCXXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

2.18

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDCXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-23.24%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.46%

-5.12%

-25.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.39%

-16.70%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.75%

0.00%

-25.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-4.05%

-6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.06%

0.90%

+16.16%

Volatility

BDCX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.36%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDCXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

0.36%

+6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.02%

5.72%

+16.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

7.43%

+19.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.44%

15.23%

+11.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

15.23%

+11.62%

BDCX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDCX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
19.59%19.17%15.28%14.71%17.47%11.52%6.32%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDCX and XTJL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDCX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to XTJL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.68% vs 4.83% for BDCX. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDCX and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer