BDCX vs. XTJL
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BDCX is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BDCX returned 4.83%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for XTJL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
BDCX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.36% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDCX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -8.64% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 7.98% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 25.72% | -15.66% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and XTJL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between BDCX and XTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
XTJL
BDCX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 2.18 | -2.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 3.23 | -3.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.48 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 3.22 | -3.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 18.27 | -19.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 2.18 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -23.24% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -5.12% | -25.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -16.70% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | 0.00% | -25.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -4.05% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.06% | 0.90% | +16.16% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.36%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 0.36% | +6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 5.72% | +16.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 7.43% | +19.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 15.23% | +11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 15.23% | +11.62% |
BDCX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 19.59% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and XTJL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to XTJL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.68% vs 4.83% for BDCX. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer