BDCX vs. UCIB
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB).
BDCX and UCIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDCX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. UCIB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. Both BDCX and UCIB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BDCX vs. UCIB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BDCX vs. UCIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -15.07% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 24.50% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 17.46% | 8.97% | 6.58% | -2.26% | 18.24% | 37.34% | 27.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -15.07% return, which is significantly lower than UCIB's 17.46% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -15.07%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- -25.21%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
UCIB
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDCX vs. UCIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UCIB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. UCIB — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
UCIB
BDCX vs. UCIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | 1.09 | -1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | 1.51 | -2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.27 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.98 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | 5.65 | -7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 1.09 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.59 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and UCIB is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BDCX vs. UCIB - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.63%, while UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 22.63% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. UCIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum UCIB drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and UCIB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -36.94% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -11.17% | -19.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -20.95% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.97% | -0.87% | -30.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -9.12% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 3.91% | +11.39% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. UCIB - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) at 5.12%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 5.12% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.85% | 15.72% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.17% | 22.34% | +9.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 24.02% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 21.62% | +5.01% |