BDCX vs. TYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. BDCX is passively managed, while TYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, BDCX returned -17.92% vs 3.96% for TYLD. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.

Performance

BDCX vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than TYLD's 1.68% return.

BDCX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: -13.68%
• 6M: -10.71%
• 1Y: -17.92%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

TYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCX vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	-13.68%	-10.42%	15.26%
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF	1.68%	4.05%	5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and TYLD is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

BDCX vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCX

BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

TYLD

TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCX vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDCX	TYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	5.41	-6.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	11.03	-11.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	2.59	-1.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	33.51	-34.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.99	124.34	-125.34

BDCX vs. TYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the TYLD Sharpe Ratio of 5.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCX and TYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and TYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDCX	TYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-1.06%	-33.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.46%	-0.12%	-30.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.85%	0.00%	-29.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.21%	-0.10%	-10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.05%	0.03%	+18.02%

Volatility

BDCX vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) at 0.15%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDCX	TYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.40%	0.15%	+8.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.09%	0.54%	+22.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.74%	0.74%	+27.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.58%	1.75%	+24.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.90%	1.75%	+25.15%

BDCX vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDCX vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than TYLD's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	20.73%	19.17%	15.28%	14.71%	17.47%	11.52%	6.32%
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF	3.74%	4.38%	4.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDCX and TYLD in my portfolio?

BDCX and TYLD have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDCX or TYLD?

BDCX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to TYLD (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs TYLD's -1.06%.

Which ETF is better, BDCX or TYLD?

On 1-year performance, TYLD leads with 3.96% vs -17.92% for BDCX. On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDCX or TYLD?

Over the 1-year period, TYLD has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -17.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDCX or TYLD?

TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDCX or TYLD?

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 3.74% for TYLD.

What is the main difference between BDCX and TYLD?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.59% for TYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.41 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.