BDCX vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BDCX is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

BDCX vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 526.74% return.

BDCX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: -13.68%
• 6M: -10.71%
• 1Y: -17.92%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: -5.81%
• 1M: 51.57%
• YTD: 526.74%
• 6M: 438.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCX vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	-13.68%	1.80%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	526.74%	-59.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and NBIG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

BDCX vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCX

BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

NBIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCX vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDCX	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.99	—	—

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDCX	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-75.83%	+40.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.85%	-7.58%	-22.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.21%	-40.71%	+30.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDCX	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.74%	199.11%	-171.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.58%	199.11%	-172.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.90%	199.11%	-172.21%

BDCX vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDCX vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	20.73%	19.17%	15.28%	14.71%	17.47%	11.52%	6.32%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDCX and NBIG in my portfolio?

BDCX and NBIG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDCX or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDCX or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDCX or NBIG?

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

What is the main difference between BDCX and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.75% for NBIG.