BDCX vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BDCX tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BDCX returned -13.87% vs 1163.51% for MVLL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

BDCX vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 779.83% return.

BDCX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -7.16%
• YTD: -8.64%
• 6M: -8.85%
• 1Y: -13.87%
• 3Y*: 4.83%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 65.00%
• 1M: 176.74%
• YTD: 779.83%
• 6M: 610.16%
• 1Y: 1,163.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCX vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	-8.64%	-13.54%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	779.83%	-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and MVLL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

BDCX vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCX

BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCX vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDCX	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	8.85	-9.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	4.74	-5.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.62	-0.69
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	24.93	-25.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	51.99	-52.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDCX vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 8.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCX and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDCX	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	8.85	-9.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	3.13	-2.67

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum MVLL drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDCX	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-59.02%	+24.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.46%	-48.93%	+18.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.75%	0.00%	-25.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-22.49%	+12.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.06%	23.46%	-6.40%

Volatility

BDCX vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) is 6.41%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 61.15%. This indicates that BDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDCX	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	61.15%	-54.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.02%	95.96%	-73.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.90%	133.02%	-106.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.44%	139.75%	-113.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.85%	139.75%	-112.90%

BDCX vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDCX vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	19.59%	19.17%	15.28%	14.71%	17.47%	11.52%	6.32%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDCX and MVLL in my portfolio?

BDCX and MVLL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDCX or MVLL?

MVLL has higher volatility (61.15%) compared to BDCX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, BDCX or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1163.51% vs -13.87% for BDCX. On fees, BDCX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BDCX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDCX or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1163.51% return vs -13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDCX or MVLL?

BDCX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDCX or MVLL?

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

What is the main difference between BDCX and MVLL?

BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: UBS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.85 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.