BDCX vs. MLPB
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDCX returned 2.33%/yr vs 19.55%/yr for MLPB. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
BDCX vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than MLPB's 19.79% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.70%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 19.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
BDCX vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -8.64% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 24.50% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 19.79% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and MLPB is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BDCX and MLPB has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
MLPB
BDCX vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCX | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 1.67 | -2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 2.33 | -2.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 2.43 | -2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 7.55 | -8.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCX | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 1.67 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.98 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.24 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -71.93% | +36.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -9.68% | -20.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -16.49% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -20.41% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -4.64% | -21.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -14.83% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.06% | 3.12% | +13.94% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) at 5.43%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.43% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 10.05% | +11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 13.53% | +13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 20.03% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 28.11% | -1.26% |
BDCX vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, more than MLPB's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 19.59% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.85% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and MLPB have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to MLPB (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs MLPB's -71.93%.
On 5-year performance, MLPB leads with 19.55% vs 2.33% for BDCX. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 5.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 19.55% return vs 2.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 5.85% for MLPB.
BDCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MLPB is MLPs. BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer