BDCX vs. DLLL
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BDCX tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%) while DLLL tracks the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BDCX returned -13.87% vs 986.47% for DLLL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
BDCX vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 816.87% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -13.27%
- 1M
- 274.22%
- YTD
- 816.87%
- 6M
- 673.02%
- 1Y
- 986.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDCX vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -8.64% | -16.11% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 816.87% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and DLLL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
DLLL
BDCX vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 7.72 | -8.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 5.05 | -5.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.63 | -0.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 16.14 | -16.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 33.77 | -34.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 7.72 | -8.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 3.38 | -2.93 |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -68.58% | +33.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -57.19% | +26.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -13.27% | -12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -25.93% | +15.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.06% | 27.33% | -10.27% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) is 6.41%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 68.33%. This indicates that BDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 68.33% | -61.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 101.80% | -79.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 129.25% | -102.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 130.59% | -104.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 130.59% | -103.74% |
BDCX vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 19.59% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and DLLL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (68.33%) compared to BDCX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 986.47% vs -13.87% for BDCX. On fees, BDCX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BDCX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 986.47% return vs -13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BDCX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). They also come from different issuers: UBS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.72 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer