PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDCX vs. DLLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDCX vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 816.87% return.


BDCX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-8.85%
1Y
-13.87%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*

DLLL

1D
-13.27%
1M
274.22%
YTD
816.87%
6M
673.02%
1Y
986.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDCX vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDCX and DLLL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDCX vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDCX
BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDCX vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDCXDLLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

7.72

-8.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.60

5.05

-5.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.63

-0.70

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

16.14

-16.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

33.77

-34.65

BDCX vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the DLLL Sharpe Ratio of 7.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDCX and DLLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDCXDLLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

7.72

-8.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

3.38

-2.93

Drawdowns

BDCX vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and DLLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDCXDLLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-68.58%

+33.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.46%

-57.19%

+26.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.75%

-13.27%

-12.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-25.93%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.06%

27.33%

-10.27%

Volatility

BDCX vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) is 6.41%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 68.33%. This indicates that BDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDCXDLLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

68.33%

-61.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.02%

101.80%

-79.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

129.25%

-102.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.44%

130.59%

-104.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

130.59%

-103.74%

BDCX vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDCX vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
19.59%19.17%15.28%14.71%17.47%11.52%6.32%
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDCX and DLLL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLLL has higher volatility (68.33%) compared to BDCX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs DLLL's -68.58%.

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 986.47% vs -13.87% for BDCX. On fees, BDCX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BDCX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 986.47% return vs -13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BDCX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). They also come from different issuers: UBS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 1.50% for DLLL.

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.72 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDCX and DLLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer