BDCX vs. AMUB
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDCX returned 1.22%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for AMUB. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.
Performance
BDCX vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than AMUB's 14.01% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -10.71%
- 1Y
- -17.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AMUB
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- 14.01%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
BDCX vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -13.68% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 25.40% |
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 14.01% | 2.05% | 15.68% | 16.89% | 21.91% | 28.83% | -5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and AMUB is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BDCX and AMUB has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
AMUB
BDCX vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDCX | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.17 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.24 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 3.36 | -4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. AMUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum AMUB drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and AMUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -79.46% | +44.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -10.69% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -17.22% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -20.58% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.85% | -8.53% | -21.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -29.11% | +18.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.05% | 3.92% | +14.13% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. AMUB - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) at 5.28%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | 5.28% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.09% | 10.09% | +13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 13.85% | +13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 20.12% | +6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 27.13% | -0.23% |
BDCX vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, while AMUB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 20.73% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and AMUB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to AMUB (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs AMUB's -79.46%.
On 5-year performance, AMUB leads with 11.55% vs 1.22% for BDCX. On fees, AMUB is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, AMUB has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMUB has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMUB is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.00% for AMUB.
BDCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMUB is MLPs. BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.80% for AMUB.
AMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and AMUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer