BDBT vs. VTG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.

Performance

BDBT vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's 0.11% return.

BDBT

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTG

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDBT vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	0.29%	3.74%
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF	0.11%	3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and VTG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

BDBT vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 30
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

VTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBT vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDBT	VTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	—	—

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, roughly equal to the maximum VTG drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and VTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDBT	VTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-2.89%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-1.68%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-0.79%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDBT	VTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	3.52%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.86%	3.52%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.86%	3.52%	+0.34%

BDBT vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BDBT vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than VTG's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.52%	2.21%
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF	3.20%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDBT and VTG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, BDBT and VTG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BDBT or VTG?

On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDBT or VTG?

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BDBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDBT or VTG?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.

What is the main difference between BDBT and VTG?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.03% for VTG.