BDBT vs. TACN

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while TACN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TACN.

Performance

BDBT vs. TACN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than TACN's 14.30% return.

BDBT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 1Y: 2.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.19%

TACN

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: 7.83%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	$774.67K	$800.04K	$1.18M
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	$121.57K	$128.61K	$84.53K

BDBT vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	-0.13%	0.11%
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	14.30%	1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and TACN is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

BDBT vs. TACN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 22
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

TACN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDBT vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDBT	TACN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	—	—

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum TACN drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and TACN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDBT	TACN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-10.98%	+8.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	0.00%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-2.27%	+1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDBT	TACN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80%	17.32%	-13.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	17.32%	-13.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	17.32%	-13.45%

BDBT vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BDBT vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, while TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.95%	2.21%
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDBT and TACN in my portfolio?

BDBT and TACN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDBT or TACN?

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDBT or TACN?

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BDBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDBT or TACN?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.

What is the main difference between BDBT and TACN?

BDBT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while TACN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.20% for TACN.